Geofry Chaucer’s The
Canterbury Tales is one of the finest examples of vernacular literature
(written in middle English) to come from the 14th century, in my
opinion. His story follows a group of a couple dozen people going on a
pilgrimage to St. Thomas Becket’s shrine. The host of the group goes around to
have each pilgrim talk about themselves and proceed to tell stories.
The meticulously crafted style of rhyming couplets, and each
line being exactly ten syllables long, certainly places this work as a good
piece of literature, but that aspect coupled with what Chaucer offers in the
message of his Canterbury Tales makes
it a great piece of literature. The narrative device, as well as writing in a
more common language (not latin), allowed Chaucer to represent many facets of
life and many different kinds of people. The Miller’s prologue and tale are
very bawdy, and incorporate a lot of bodily humor (see: fart jokes). The Wife
of Bath’s section deals with matters of fidelity and feminine power. The Pardoner’s tale touches on themes of greed and death. The Knight’s
tale follows a man learning to respect women in a more meaningful way (that one should be taken with a grain of salt. The fictional Knight in that story sexually abuses a woman to start his journey to respect women, and Chaucer himself had a history of sexual abuse). However, these stories are all about everyday people you could find while walking through a city in Chaucer's time. These are all authentic people with authentic concerns represented in their words.
All of these stories are presented with a lot of irony and
there is a great deal of humor mixed in, so they do not feel as dated as one
might expect. Chaucer also interweaves a lot of social commentary into this
narrative. His writing can be very pointed at times, especially those who hold
the vices of greed or corruption.
Chaucer presents a wide range of different people that have
not always been presented in literature, and therefore offers different
underrepresented viewpoints or concerns. There are no epic heroes in these
stories, no one of great fame or power. Instead, these are common people and
the tales chronicle their every day concerns. This is one of the great
strengths of vernacular literature, in that it can offer perspectives of real
people. Rather than only presenting narratives about the elite and powerful,
Chaucer adds to the tradition of telling stories about everyday folk. He shows us that this kind
of representation is incredibly important, because it allows for broader
narratives and more encompassing reflection of life.
Yes. How does the vernacular allow for greater expressions of community? Chaucer's stories are timeless. The literature of the Middle Ages is fantastic. I suggest another book that I just finished. The Fabliaux. The thing that always surprises us is how real and "human" (timeless) these stories are. I hope that our class has also demonstrated that history has just as much complexity and humanity. This literature is not just a story but also a reflection of real issues, needs and social commentary (a term you use!).
ReplyDeleteDefinitely! The dialogue between fiction and history is something for which I'm growing a stronger interest.
ReplyDeleteThis is a great analysis of the Canterbury Tales. For some reason though I've read them I never really put together just how far back the Canterbury Tales were written. It's interesting to think of them in a new light, knowing they were from the time they described. We read the Canterbury Tales in my AP Literature course in High School, and the book we used had both more modern translation and the original vernacular - it was interesting to try to read!
ReplyDeleteI read the Canterbury Tales in high school because I was fascinated with anything that came out of the Middle Ages that was contrary to the belief that it was the "Dark Ages" and Chaucer was an incredible story-teller.
ReplyDelete