The TV series Vikings, which airs on the History channel, is based on the legendary leader and king of the Northmen, Ragnar Lothbrok. Although the topic and focus of this series may come off as self-explanatory the characters are complex as they follow a deeply entwined story-line during a critical period in the development of the British Isles. The main Vikings are Ragnar, Rollo (brother), Lagertha (first wife), and Bjorn (son).[1] This show is focused on the Viking’s perspective. Therefore, the foreigners are the Anglo-Saxon and Frankish kings Ecbert of Wessex, Aella of Northumbria, and Charles of Frankia. As the series unfolds it follows Ragnar and his family through their raids first into Northumbria, then Wessex, and finally to Paris (Frankia). Through the period of Viking raids, beginning in year 793, the Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms faced not only invasion but occupation.[2] Through this period there were power struggles between kings and a supernatural battle between the gods of the Northmen and the Christian God.
Characters ordered from right to left: Ragnar, Lagertha, Rollo, and Bjorn |
All of these
themes and ideas are what the TV series Vikings focuses on. Despite its
presence in popular culture and use of dramatization, I argue that Vikings
is helpful in gaining a basic understanding of historical figures and the events
that happened during the ninth and tenth centuries. This includes major
characters in the period and commonly agreed upon themes such as a desire for
expansion and religious confusion.
Vikings offers exposure to characters of the past.
Although sources do not confirm the proven existence of a King Ragnar
Lothbrock, twelfth century sagas do reveal the story of Ragnar. Sagas and
folklore accredit Ragnar as the father of many famous and recorded Viking
leaders during the ninth century including Bjorn Ironside, Ivar the Boneless,
Halfdan Ragnarsson, Sigrud Snake in the Eye, and Ubba. All of these men were
leaders of the Great Heathen Army which invaded the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms in
865.[3]
According to the sagas, along with being depicted in the series, these men were
all the sons of Ragnar Lothbrok. Concerning Ragnar’s foes in the TV series,
King Ecbert was an actual king in Wessex. And, as depicted in the series,
Ecbert’s son was Aethelwolf. Despite the dramatization within the series
concerning his son’s legitimacy, Aetholwolf did have a son named Alfred who
eventually became Alfred the Great. The character of Alfred the Great is
important to the contribution Vikings makes for a historical
understanding and connection to Medieval Europe because the unification of the
Anglo-Saxon kingdoms is greatly attributed to the actions of King Alfred the
Great.[4]
Finally, just as it is depicted in Vikings, King Charles was a king in Frankia.
Within the series King Charles is depicted as the grandson of Charlemagne.
According to records a grandson and a great-grandson of Charlemagne were both
kings in Frankia and they were both named Charles. So, not only do the names
line up, but, similar to the role Alfred and his family play, King Charles
contributes to the understanding of the importance of Charlemagne in this
period. Historical records explain that kings following Charlemagne such as
Otto II and Otto III were so concerned with him that Otto II was buried in the
same church and Otto III descended into the tomb of Charlemagne.[5]
In Vikings, King Charles is haunted as much as he is praised for being
the descendant of Charlemagne because of the expectations that bloodline was
believed to uphold. Today, we know that Charlemagne played one of the most
essential roles in the foundation and organization of northern Europe.
Therefore, the constant reminder of King Charles’ ancestry in Vikings adequately
portrays the importance and legacy of Charlemagne in this period.
King Ecbert, pictured to the right of Aethelstan, is granting Lagertha land for a Northmen's settlement in Wessex. |
Next, Vikings shows the concern of more than raiding
and pleasure by Ragnar for his purpose in raiding new lands. In the first
season Ragnar shows his curiosity in what else is out in the world. This is a
major fact that is typically glossed over and ignored in films depicting
Vikings. A large amount of popular culture depicts Vikings as solely desiring
war and money. However, in their homeland Vikings main economic source was
farming and livestock, and due to large estates owned by few people the
Northmen faced a shortage in land availability.[6]
As a result, along with some other factors, the Northmen went in search for farmland
as Ragnar does in Vikings.
Finally, Vikings does contain inadequacies that harm
its representation of medieval culture. First, King Ecbert is extremely
interested in the Roman artifacts that surround him. In the second season of Vikings
King Ecbert uses a monk, Aethelstan, that Ragnar had captured during the
first season to transcribe scrolls and translate them from Latin. He makes
comments about the “wonders” and “insight” of the Romans. Through King Ecbert’s
character the writer for Vikings ignore the argument that many people
saw the kingdoms of Europe as a continuation of the Roman Empire not a
recession from the Romans’ achievements. In a letter to an Abbot, Charlemagne
describes himself no only as king but also as the, “Patrician of the Romans.”[7]
This statement by Charlemagne reveals a sense of continuation rather than
cessation from the Roman period. Despite this variance, King Ecbert and the
monk Aethelstan do reveal a struggle between a full faith in the Christian God
and the idea of pagan gods having power and influence in the world. This could
be used to show Bennett’s argument about the Irish missionaries that worked
within the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms and their lack of forceful repentance from
cultural traditions. As a result of the amalgamation of Christianity and
cultural traditions a coexistent belief could have been present which King
Ecbert and Aethelstan reveal in their characters.
Another inaccuracy is the strong presence of shield maidens,
or female warriors. In Vikings there are many women shown on the
battlefield fighting alongside women and although the sagas and folklore
highlight a presence of shield maidens many scholars argue their presence was a
rarity. Bennett explains that the society of Northmen was very patriarchal and
states that men raided but men and women settled.[8]
Therefore, the use of women on the battlefield as a commonality is inadequate
but showing their importance in the process of holding and settling the land
following a raid is not. As a result, there may not have been shield maidens
but many arguments do claim that the women of Viking culture were present and
played a major role during the Viking period.
Overall, Vikings may not be chronologically correct,
and some of the characters may be based off of sagas from this period rather
than historical records but it can reveal the relation of the different rulers
in the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms along with the importance of Charlemagne to
Frankish royalty. This series also displays that there were push factors, such
as a need for more land, along with pull factors, gold, that drew the Northmen
to raid the mid-European kingdoms. And finally, despite its inaccuracies, Vikings
shows that there could have been a development of coexistent religious
beliefs and that there was a role for women within the Northmen’s culture.
Although Vikings embellishes and dramatizes some aspects of the early
Medieval Anglo-Saxon period, it shows viewers many aspects that spark
interest and escape the traditional thought of Vikings as blood thirsty gold
seekers.
[1]
Relations are in reference to the individuals’ relationship to Ragnar in the series Vikings.
[2]
Date provided by: Judith M. Bennett, Medieval Europe: A Short History (New York: McGraw Hill Education, 2010), 109.
[3] "Ragnar Lodbrok", Wikipedia, last modified September 8, 2016, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ragnar_Lodbrok.
[4] Judith M. Bennett, Medieval Europe: A Short History (New York: McGraw Hill Education, 2010), 112.
[5]
Class notes.
[6] Judith M. Bennett, Medieval Europe: A Short History (New York: McGraw Hill Education, 2010), 107.
[7]
Charlemagne, Letter to Baugulf, Abbot of Fulda. Course Packet, ed. Shelley Wolbrink
(2016): 28-29.
[8] Judith M. Bennett, Medieval Europe: A Short History (New York: McGraw Hill Education, 2010), 109.
This is a great post. I love Vikings. I am a little disappointed about the shield maidens, though. I figure any television show has inaccuracies, but there are some things one hopes to believe...
ReplyDelete